WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 2 (Abandoned)

[Tordeck]

Ok Manders. After that big post I am comfortable enough to say I was wrong.

unvote

[Manders]

Manders, how much do you trust yourself to hunt scum without meta?

Uh...a lot? I'm pretty sure I'd never played with rednihilist before last game. And, if I did, it would have been at least a year ago.

Long story short, I didn't know his meta, and was spot on. I've had some pretty quality players give me very helpful hints of what to look for.

[Manders]

Ok Manders. After that big post I am comfortable enough to say I was wrong.

unvote

I am SO still watching you.

[rezombad]

Nothing in particular. Pretty much what I listed above.

You were hoping to get a wagon going on kpaca with one naked vote?

I dont understand your thought process here stardust.

Also, hunt responded to manders.

[Manders]

Nothing in particular. Pretty much what I listed above.

You were hoping to get a wagon going on kpaca with one naked vote?

I dont understand your thought process here stardust.

Also, hunt responded to manders.

What do you think he was trying to do?

And did he? Lemme check, I'm pretty sure I asked a follow-up question.

[Manders]

Yeah, he hasn't responded to this post.

Heh, what do you mean? I've never been much for early Day 1 analysis. I'll get on it soon enough.

You're not even trying. Extremely uncharacteristic for you.

How many people are in this game, Huntzilla?

10

How many people had responded before you changed your mind? Don't go check, off the top of your head.

Why the claim talk?
Mtgs meta is claim happy right now, wanted to test waters and see where we stood. Your flat out no statement killed any other reactions I might get because everyone follows you like a bunch of puppies around here.
Literally shits and gigs. I think it's bullshit you thought I was scum at that point in the game. Liar.

I'm up to like 8 games, all on MTGS.

I'd kill Kpaca now that I know it is him. That makes the mod vote that much more worse in my eyes. Maybe you depending on where you go with this "I knew hunt was scum" lie you are rolling with.

Jesus Christ, use quotes.

MTGS is full of lazy people who don't want to WORK to win the game. No claims. (I miss the good 'ol days )

Everyone follows me like a bunch of puppies? Provide examples from this game.

You can think it's bullshit all you want. Who did you think I was referring to?

Your reaction to the revelation has been very telling.
Vote: Huntzilla

How does it being kpaca make the mod vote worse? (Nice OMGUS at the end there, though.

[rezombad]

he responded to post 52 in post 62, however poorly. Stardust said he would see how hunt responded in post 58.
The post you just quoted him not responding to is your post #63.
Not that you didnt follow up, but he did respond.

[rezombad]

Nothing in particular. Pretty much what I listed above.

You were hoping to get a wagon going on kpaca with one naked vote?

I dont understand your thought process here stardust.

Also, hunt responded to manders.

What do you think he was trying to do?

And did he? Lemme check, I'm pretty sure I asked a follow-up question.

I dont know what he was trying to do, thats why im asking. That way, we can refer to it later if necessary.

[Manders]

he responded to post 52 in post 62, however poorly. Stardust said he would see how hunt responded in post 58.
The post you just quoted him not responding to is your post #63.
Not that you didnt follow up, but he did respond.

Oh ok. I see what you're getting at.

[Manders]

Nothing in particular. Pretty much what I listed above.

You were hoping to get a wagon going on kpaca with one naked vote?

I dont understand your thought process here stardust.

Also, hunt responded to manders.

What do you think he was trying to do?

And did he? Lemme check, I'm pretty sure I asked a follow-up question.

I dont know what he was trying to do, thats why im asking. That way, we can refer to it later if necessary.

You have no theories? I'd like you to share them before Stardust posts again if you do.

[rezombad]

I have an idea or two, but im not going to post them until im satisfied with his explanations and maybe not even then.
But trying to start a wagon or get a reaction from kpaca with that post is nonsense.

[rezombad]

Ok Manders. After that big post I am comfortable enough to say I was wrong.

unvote

Post 52?

[Tordeck]

That's fine hun, watch all you want.

[Manders]

I have an idea or two, but im not going to post them until im satisfied with his explanations and maybe not even then.
But trying to start a wagon or get a reaction from kpaca with that post is nonsense.

None of it, from kpaca's vote to Stardust's, is nonsense, but I'll leave it be for now.

Your refusal to oblige me is noted. Do you think I'm scum?

[rezombad]

Not right now, more null. And since i dont have to make a read on you, im not gonna worry about that and instead focus on what ive been doing.

[Stardust]

Nothing in particular. Pretty much what I listed above.

You were hoping to get a wagon going on kpaca with one naked vote?

I dont understand your thought process here stardust.

Hunter was voting him too. It's not that I was trying to get a wagon going on kpaca. The image of there being a wagon gives information on choices that other players make. Do they join the kpaca wagon? Do they vote somewhere else? Do they question my vote, or do they ignore it? All that stuff makes a vote on kpaca more valuable than a simple unvote.

Also, hunt responded to manders.

I know. I don't have time right now to get into that. I haven't even read Manders' big post in detail yet.

[rezombad]

Nothing in particular. Pretty much what I listed above.

You were hoping to get a wagon going on kpaca with one naked vote?

I dont understand your thought process here stardust.

Hunter was voting him too. It's not that I was trying to get a wagon going on kpaca. The image of there being a wagon gives information on choices that other players make. Do they join the kpaca wagon? Do they vote somewhere else? Do they question my vote, or do they ignore it? All that stuff makes a vote on kpaca more valuable than a simple unvote.

Also, hunt responded to manders.

I know. I don't have time right now to get into that. I haven't even read Manders' big post in detail yet.

So there are 5 people with 1 vote on them and you vote for kpaca.
Instead of picking any of the more active people or even newer people and applying some kind of pressure to them about literally anything. And, yknow, contributing. You vote someone who cannot be compelled to do anything he doesnt want to as some kind of roundabout way of maybe getting someone who isnt paying any attention at all to focus on kpaca?

Do i have a solid understanding of this situation?

[Mogadishu Jones]

I honestly thought wed be still in rvs right now. Are we doing things?

[Mogadishu Jones]

Lol @ the mod vote.

[Stardust]

So there are 5 people with 1 vote on them and you vote for kpaca.

I didn't know where we sat on the votecount, but Hunter voting for kpaca was meaningful since Hunter himself was under scrutiny. If Manders was correct that Hunter was scum, me making his vote more legitimate does give more information on other players. And, yes, kpaca can't be arsed to do much he doesn't want to do, but he does react to votes as much as the next guy, sometimes in an over-the-top angry kind of way.

What should I have done with my vote instead, in your opinion?

[Mogadishu Jones]

I almost never react to votes what are you on? I generally dont believe anyone can lynch me.

[Manders]

Yeah I don't think I've ever seen him do more than "pshah" at a vote. Second his absolutely non-rhetorical question, Stardust.

[rezombad]

So there are 5 people with 1 vote on them and you vote for kpaca.

I didn't know where we sat on the votecount, but Hunter voting for kpaca was meaningful since Hunter himself was under scrutiny. If Manders was correct that Hunter was scum, me making his vote more legitimate does give more information on other players. And, yes, kpaca can't be arsed to do much he doesn't want to do, but he does react to votes as much as the next guy, sometimes in an over-the-top angry kind of way.

What should I have done with my vote instead, in your opinion?

I get it i think. It just doesnt seem sound to me.

Wouldnt it have been easier to get people to jump on kpaca(or anyone) with even the flimsiest of accusations? How does your naked vote compel anyone to join your wagon?

I wouldve liked you to have put some thought into/ explained your vote i guess, regardless of who you wanted to see lynched.

[Huntzilla]

How many people had responded before you changed your mind? Don't go check, off the top of your head.

You and Tordeck. 2... mwa ha ha...
It was also just a suggestion. I was not dead set on doing so, otherwise I would have started off with my claim.

Jesus Christ, use quotes.

MTGS is full of lazy people who don't want to WORK to win the game. No claims. (I miss the good 'ol days )

Everyone follows me like a bunch of puppies? Provide examples from this game.

You can think it's bullshit all you want. Who did you think I was referring to?

Your reaction to the revelation has been very telling.
Vote: Huntzilla

How does it being kpaca make the mod vote worse? (Nice OMGUS at the end there, though.

I can't provide examples from this game for the puppy comment... But I can point out the number of votes you garnered for no reason. That points to people centering around you to feel you out, which in turn will allow them to sheep you later should you "pan out" as town to them.

I actually figured you had meant Tordeck.

Kpaca should know better than to make mod votes... it is an old RVS tell that always gets called out.
Thanks! I mean I tempered the OMGUS a little by just saying I WOULD kill you. Not that I thought you were scum. Because I don't think you are, I think you're just wrong.

[Huntzilla]

So there are 5 people with 1 vote on them and you vote for kpaca.

I didn't know where we sat on the votecount, but Hunter voting for kpaca was meaningful since Hunter himself was under scrutiny. If Manders was correct that Hunter was scum, me making his vote more legitimate does give more information on other players. And, yes, kpaca can't be arsed to do much he doesn't want to do, but he does react to votes as much as the next guy, sometimes in an over-the-top angry kind of way.

What should I have done with my vote instead, in your opinion?

I didn't vote for him when I was under scrutiny. I voted for him for RVS for the "mod vote tell." What are you getting at with that first sentence, because it makes no freaking sense?

[Tordeck]

vote stardust

His line of thinking just makes no sense.

[rezombad]

vote stardust

His line of thinking just makes no sense.

Hi. Yes. See post 92

[Manders]

How many people had responded before you changed your mind? Don't go check, off the top of your head.

You and Tordeck. 2... mwa ha ha...
It was also just a suggestion. I was not dead set on doing so, otherwise I would have started off with my claim.

Jesus Christ, use quotes.

MTGS is full of lazy people who don't want to WORK to win the game. No claims. (I miss the good 'ol days )

Everyone follows me like a bunch of puppies? Provide examples from this game.

You can think it's bullshit all you want. Who did you think I was referring to?

Your reaction to the revelation has been very telling.
Vote: Huntzilla

How does it being kpaca make the mod vote worse? (Nice OMGUS at the end there, though.

I can't provide examples from this game for the puppy comment... But I can point out the number of votes you garnered for no reason. That points to people centering around you to feel you out, which in turn will allow them to sheep you later should you "pan out" as town to them.

I actually figured you had meant Tordeck.

Kpaca should know better than to make mod votes... it is an old RVS tell that always gets called out.
Thanks! I mean I tempered the OMGUS a little by just saying I WOULD kill you. Not that I thought you were scum. Because I don't think you are, I think you're just wrong.

Have you ever played with kpaca or read games he was in? If so, how much?

[Mogadishu Jones]

If I was scum would I do this!!

unvote:

Vote: huntzilla vote: huntzilla

[Tordeck]

@rez, if you cannot figure out which post i was talking about by actually reading the thread then there is just no help for you.

Obviously i was talking about her T/S list post. Like Duh!

[Dechs Kaison]

Votecount 1.2

Ham (1): RedNihilist
Stardust (2): Tordeck, Ham
Mojo (2): Huntzilla, Stardust
Manders (1): Pedrobear
Huntzilla (3): Manders, MoJo, MoJo

Not voting: rezombad, ( G_R )

Pretty sure that's right. With 10 alive, it's 6 to lynch.

[Manders]

If I was scum would I do this!!

unvote:

Vote: huntzilla vote: huntzilla

Votecount 1.2

Ham (1): RedNihilist
Stardust (2): Tordeck, Ham
Mojo (1): Huntzilla, Stardust
Manders (1): Pedrobear
Huntzilla (3): Manders, MoJo, MoJo

Not voting: rezombad, ( G_R )

Pretty sure that's right. With 10 alive, it's 6 to lynch.

[/quote]
Haha yes!

[RedNihilist]

Unvote
Things get interesting.

[RedNihilist]

rezombad - Liking him so far.
( G_R ) - His interactions are strictly Stardust-based up to now, and he seems to have disappeared lately.
Pedrobear - Is he still alive? That's not good.
Stardust - Very silly start.
Manders - This game is Manders-centered so far. I don't like her start, I don't like her inside-game with Tordeck, I don't like post #21 as I think she missed the point there. I DO like the nonclaim, I do like the interaction with Huntzilla and Stardust.
MoJo - for the moment I refuse to believe that scum would be given a double voting role.
Huntzilla - I don't like his trying to start the game with a pseudo-mass claim, but at least he managed to get some content out. Let's see
Tordeck - Unreadable to me at the moment. I hope everything's fine with the real life btw.
RedNihilist - Hi, handsome.
Ham - He's doing nothing unHammy for the moment and that's good to me, I'll reassess his position later but he sounds pretty towny.

[Huntzilla]

Have you ever played with kpaca or read games he was in? If so, how much?

I have only played with him twice recently (both ongoing and he replaced out, which was sad), and read a few games on here that I mentioned with him in it, and maybe one other with him on MTGS.

So limited, compared to your experience with him I'm sure.

[Huntzilla]

If I was scum would I do this!!

unvote:

Vote: huntzilla vote: huntzilla

Why didn't you just say so.


unvote Mojo

[Manders]

How did I miss the point in post 21?

[Pedrobear]

I'm not dead and I've read almost everything there. Haven't seen something I could assess so I'm just waiting. Will do a recheck soon.

[Manders]

If I was scum would I do this!!

unvote:

Vote: huntzilla vote: huntzilla

Why didn't you just say so.


unvote Mojo

So given that you know it was kpaca who voted the mod, and have seen that he has a confirmed double vote, why do you think he is scum?

[Huntzilla]

The double vote clears him, as I do not believe scum would end up with a double vote even in this role madness.

So...

He isn't scum. I doubt you are after our exchanges.

Stardust is standing out to me at this point