Dies to Removal

It's back!

http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/A ... eature/238


IMHO, Crucible of Worlds is one of the most useful cards out there, for creative deck builders. Here's hoping Magic players come up with something as useful.

Agreed, it looks as though the result of the first vote will be land, im looking forward to how wizards will handle the future steps in this because im pretty sure they will work to throw some curveballs at us.

R-Add RRR to your Mana Pool.

Timeshifted Dark Ritual is what I want.

EDIT: We need Mana Smilies.

They just banned Seething Song in Modern...

EDIT: We need Mana Smilies.

so we have a runoff and i guess the two options have team names.

im with team jacob

Yeah, a land is not gonna be a good idea, unless we all come up with some sort of manland-gone-fetchland or something Wizards is not likely to print anyway. Remember Tiago Chan's first submission for winning the invitational?

Go team enchantment!

I'm happy with land because there are some cool lands you're just not thinking hard enough. Enchantments blow goats unless they're sorcery speed removal spells or game-making/breaking.

Tiago Chan's invitational card wasn't a good land card because the design was boring. There are many lands that see play that are not boring. The process of designing a land vs creature or whatever is probably not as exciting as designing a creature vs Planeswalker.

All of my decks play lands. Few play enchantments.

im actually pretty happy with either but land is preferred by me by a slight margin. Enchantments have basically been done by CoW since that was pretty much a colorless enchantment. Lands could be fetched, they could make it into a ton of decks or they could even do something other than produce mana(anyone saying that this isnt done anymore needs to look at eye of ugin and realize an exception could occur again).

Enchantments also have a lot of design space so either would be cool but land is first for me

I guess another pro for land is that the card could potentially be used in decks of any color. I may be about to turn just because of this.

I'm happy with land because there are some cool lands you're just not thinking hard enough. Enchantments blow goats unless they're sorcery speed removal spells or game-making/breaking.

Tiago Chan's invitational card wasn't a good land card because the design was boring. There are many lands that see play that are not boring. The process of designing a land vs creature or whatever is probably not as exciting as designing a creature vs Planeswalker.

All of my decks play lands. Few play enchantments.

That's why I'd like a see a enchantment created that isn't horrible or Game Breaking.

"Every time a goat comes into play put a Goat Token on *
Something something Goat Tokens!"

I dunno I'm bad at making cards

"Every time a goat comes into play put a Goat Token on *
Something something Goat Tokens!"

I would play this card as worded.

I love lands so I voted land. Even before someone told me not to. Suck it, mtgcolorpie.

I'm voting land. I don't need another unplayable Phyrexian Arena variant, thank you.

how about a land with storm?

Doesn't work under current rules. Storm triggers on casting a spell, lands are not spells. Also land tokens are not a thing.

Land-:tap: The Next{Or whatever it would take for balance} Spell you play has storm.
(When you cast this spell, copy it for each spell cast before it this turn. You may choose new targets for the copies.)

So what color enchantment is everybody here voting for?

I'm probably going to vote .

I'm not going to vote because I'm lazy. I'm sure the result will be some crappy black Arena variant.

dammit red lost

the card will probably read "you lose the game for making poor card choices". It will probably look like some other combination of words, though.

I submitted a card being pay x life get x 1/1's into play