No worries. Can't find day one standings / results on scg. Anyone know how PSully did? I think he was playing burn in legacy. He was 2-0 in standard when he did his deck tech. I have a man crush on him.Thanks Johnny. That Midrange Red Deck is VERY appealing to me personally, i love decks with that sort of card quality (no dip in quality of draw as the game goes on).
[Fedoras of Salvation] - White Knights ITT
Moderator: redthirst
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
I think the points he makes about needing an aggressive 1 drop; needing good mana; needing to impact the board and be proactive are all good points that are worth understanding if you're a developing red mage.
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Bona fide hustler making my name
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Found the standings. He's 81st with 15 points which means he's 5-3 across standard and legacy.I think the points he makes about needing an aggressive 1 drop; needing good mana; needing to impact the board and be proactive are all good points that are worth understanding if you're a developing red mage.
Top 96 / 15+ points make day two, so he's in.
- Platypus
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 1448
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:30 pm
Thanks! Yeah, Gruul players going towards mono red, I'm definitely one of those. The current decks are basically red already, and Mutavaults will be an important part of future aggro decks and can't see those in the current Gruul decks at all. It would mess too much with the mana base, I think. As for the
Gruul players will probably make the shift to mono-red. Three colour decks will try to cut to two colours or start playing main deck cards that can kill burning earth (think acidic slime, oblivion ring etc.). UWR will likely revert to UW. My guess is that the top tier decks will be Jund, Junk Rites, U/W flash, and RDW. Tier two decks will be white weenie, mono black control, gw aggro,bant hexproof, naya blitz and both flavors of aristocrats
rest, sounds plausible. But you don't think Junk Rites will suffer a bit from Scavening Ooze?
Last edited by Platypus on Sat Jul 27, 2013 9:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Sig by NBW
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Cool. If he is playing Burn in legacy at the moment, that's AMBITIOUS. I wouldn't touch that deck if you paid me right now.
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Bona fide hustler making my name
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
He mentioned 8 mountains in his legacy deck. I think it's probably burn.Cool. If he is playing Burn in legacy at the moment, that's AMBITIOUS. I wouldn't touch that deck if you paid me right now.
Why do you think burn is bad in legacy right now? I admitidly don't play much legacy, but it hasn't lost anything that I'm aware of.
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
BBD was 4-0 in standard with junk rights. Wins over Brad Nelson and Gerry Thompson. So yeah, it's still good.Thanks! Yeah, Gruul players going towards mono red, I'm definitely one of those. The current decks are basically red already, and Mutavaults
Gruul players will probably make the shift to mono-red. Three colour decks will try to cut to two colours or start playing main deck cards that can kill burning earth (think acidic slime, oblivion ring etc.). UWR will likely revert to UW. My guess is that the top tier decks will be Jund, Junk Rites, U/W flash, and RDW. Tier two decks will be white weenie, mono black control, gw aggro,bant hexproof, naya blitz and both flavors of aristocrats
will be an important part of future aggro decks and can't see those in the current Gruul decks at all. It would mess too much too much with the mana base, I think. As for the rest, sounds plausible. But you don't think Junk Rites will suffer a bit from Scavening Ooze?
- Platypus
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 1448
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:30 pm
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
It isn't want Burn lost, it is what other decks have gained. Burn's previous best card was Sulphuric Vortex, but now Abrupt Decay is EVERYWHERE. Also, there is more combo than fair decks at the moment, and those are badHe mentioned 8 mountains in his legacy deck. I think it's probably burn.Cool. If he is playing Burn in legacy at the moment, that's AMBITIOUS. I wouldn't touch that deck if you paid me right now.
Why do you think burn is bad in legacy right now? I admitidly don't play much legacy, but it hasn't lost anything that I'm aware of.
matchups for Burn.
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Bona fide hustler making my name
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Maybe that's why he's 5-3.It isn't want Burn lost, it is what other decks haveHe mentioned 8 mountains in his legacy deck. I think it's probably burn.Cool. If he is playing Burn in legacy at the moment, that's AMBITIOUS. I wouldn't touch that deck if you paid me right now.
Why do you think burn is bad in legacy right now? I admitidly don't play much legacy, but it hasn't lost anything that I'm aware of.
gained. Burn's previous best card was Sulphuric Vortex, but now Abrupt Decay is EVERYWHERE. Also, there is more combo than fair decks at the moment, and those are bad matchups for Burn.
Everytime I finish a legacy deck it becomes irrelevant. Please don't tell me that's the case with burn. I won't build another legacy deck.
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
- Platypus
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 1448
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:30 pm
If I get Mutavaults, my Legacy Sliver deck will be just about finished (dual lands/fetches are wonky though). That deck hasn't been relevant in years (if ever...).
Everytime I finish a legacy deck it becomes irrelevant. Please don't tell me that's the case with burn. I won't build another legacy deck.
Sig by NBW
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Do I finish foiling it out and say "fuck the meta, tap mountains", or sell it all?Yeah it's been pretty irrelevant for a while lol. Burn was never, ever Tier 1 anyway.
I really hate how a new cards can make your thousand dollar legacy deck irrelevant (although my mostly foiled burn deck isn't worth as much as Eva Green was).
It just makes me hate legacy all the more. Everyone pretends that you buy the deck once and
you're finnished, but that isn't tye case. New cards still shake the meta up and ruin everything.
Maybe just put in Young Pyromancer
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Platypus
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 1448
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:30 pm
If you have a deck you know really well, then you will probably do better with it than the latest deck you haven't played with, even if the new deck is slightly better. If the new deck is a lot better, then that's probably a better choice though.
But when it comes to the current decks, I can't give any solid advice since I haven't played since early June, and haven't done any testing after M14. But I'm leaning towards the current KDW version right now for Game Day. I really like the look of that one, both the maindeck and sideboard. It's close to my Gruul aggro deck as well, so I'll probably do better with it than with an AIR variant.
But when it comes to the current decks, I can't give any solid advice since I haven't played since early June, and haven't done any testing after M14. But I'm leaning towards the current KDW version right now for Game Day. I really like the look of that one, both the maindeck and sideboard. It's close to my Gruul aggro deck as well, so I'll probably do better with it than with an AIR variant.
Sig by NBW
- Alex
- Not Even MAD
- Posts: 4236
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:50 pm
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
It doesn't make sense that the options you give me are:
1) play a deck you have had recent success with and understand
2) tell you to play a deck you have not played, I have not played and has had an uncertain level of success at an as of yet unconcluded event.
You're a smart guy, you tell me how much sense that line of questioning makes.
1) play a deck you have had recent success with and understand
2) tell you to play a deck you have not played, I have not played and has had an uncertain level of success at an as of yet unconcluded event.
You're a smart guy, you tell me how much sense that line of questioning makes.
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Bona fide hustler making my name
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
If I pitch legacy burn, I'm not playing legacy anymore. Format is too expensive / much more changing than people let on / not supported enough.I would pitch the deck but that's coming from someone who only plays Legacy decks with Jace or Umezawa's Jitte in them.What should I play at the GPT tomorrow? The list I've been testing (in the mono red thread) or PSully's list? Opinions? Z? Platypus?
That being said, what's your budget like?
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Fair enough. I'm on the fence and just looking for opinions.It doesn't make sense that the options you give me are:
1) play a deck you have had recent success with and understand
2) tell you to play a deck you have not played, I have not played and has had an uncertain level of success at an as of yet unconcluded event.
You're a smart guy, you tell me how much sense that line of questioning makes.
Most of what PSully said about dodging pillars makes sense to me. He's trying to go under midrange, whereas I tend to go through / over. I think I'll stick with my current build based on not having time to test the new build and the posibility that my deck is better positioned within the local meta.
- Alex
- Not Even MAD
- Posts: 4236
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:50 pm
I don't know, this is what I've been playing and it wasn't horribly difficult to assemble/learn?If I pitch legacy burn, I'm not playing legacy anymore. Format is too expensive / much more changing thanI would pitch the deck but that's coming from someone who only plays Legacy decks with Jace or Umezawa's Jitte in them.What should I play at the GPT tomorrow? The list I've been testing (in the mono red thread) or PSully's list? Opinions? Z? Platypus?
That being said, what's your budget like?
people let on / not supported enough.
[deck]Punishing Fire makes people rage[/deck]
A good portion of the "meat" of this deck are also Modern staples. *Shrug.*
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
About $1700 in cards I don't own. Not going there again.I don't know, this is what I've been playing and it wasn't horribly difficult to assemble/learn?If I pitch legacy burn, I'm not playing legacy anymore. Format is too expensive / much more changing than people let on / not supported enough.I would pitch the deck but that's coming from someone who only plays Legacy decks with Jace or Umezawa's Jitte in them.What should I play at the GPT tomorrow? The list I've been testing (in the mono red thread) or PSully's list? Opinions? Z? Platypus?
That
being said, what's your budget like?
[deck]Punishing Fire makes people rage[/deck]
A good portion of the "meat" of this deck are also Modern
staples. *Shrug.*
- Alex
- Not Even MAD
- Posts: 4236
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:50 pm
I mean, I don't know. Last time I played Legacy, I played against a Burning-Tree Emissary Gruul list. So there's that...
Burning-Tree Emissary into Umezawa's Jitte is some brutal beats.
I'm sure there's likely also a version of Maverick floating around right now that could be built with 90%+ Modern cards.
Burning-Tree Emissary into Umezawa's Jitte is some brutal beats.
I'm sure there's likely also a version of Maverick floating around right now that could be built with 90%+ Modern cards.
Last edited by Alex on Sat Jul 27, 2013 11:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Platypus
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 1448
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:30 pm
I say keep the deck. Looks like you're in a similar situation as me when it comes to Legacy.I know that Legacy Burn isn't tier 1, maybe tier 1.5 on a good day. But Legacy tournaments are few and far between around here, so there's no point in spending any more than I've done so far unless the cards are usable in Modern. I'll get a few Flame Rifts at some point, but that's it. So I'll gladly take the deck to any eventual Legacy tournaments anyway, since it's still a deck and it's still fun Magic. And based on my one and only Legacy tournament, everybody fears Price of Progress.If I pitch legacy burn, I'm not playing legacy anymore. Format is too expensive / much more changing thanI would pitch the deck but that's coming from someone who only plays Legacy decks with Jace or Umezawa's Jitte in them.What should I play at the GPT tomorrow? The list I've been testing (in the mono red thread) or PSully's list? Opinions? Z? Platypus?
That being said, what's your budget like?
people let on / not supported enough.
Last edited by Platypus on Sat Jul 27, 2013 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sig by NBW
- Alex
- Not Even MAD
- Posts: 4236
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:50 pm
Oh look I already found said Maverick list that WON a Legacy open a month ago that is primarily Modern cards: http://sales.starcitygames.com//deckdat ... ckID=56773
- Alex
- Not Even MAD
- Posts: 4236
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:50 pm
PS: Modern adaptations to cards in that list:
Swords to Plowshares -> Path to Exile or Oust.
A/B duals -> Shocks.
At that point I think the only non-Modern card worth more than a buck is Mother of Runes? What are those like 5 bucks?
Legacy isn't as unreasonable as it used to be. Thanks to Modern being a format, a lot of tuning is being done to those decks, and that's creeping over into Legacy because the power level of Modern and Legacy decks are pretty similar.
Swords to Plowshares -> Path to Exile or Oust.
A/B duals -> Shocks.
At that point I think the only non-Modern card worth more than a buck is Mother of Runes? What are those like 5 bucks?
Legacy isn't as unreasonable as it used to be. Thanks to Modern being a format, a lot of tuning is being done to those decks, and that's creeping over into Legacy because the power level of Modern and Legacy decks are pretty similar.
- Platypus
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 1448
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:30 pm
Ahem...Karakas and Maze of Ith. But those two are perhaps not essential.PS: Modern adaptations to cards in that list:
Swords to Plowshares -> Path to Exile or Oust.
A/B duals -> Shocks.
At that point I think the only non-Modern card worth more than a buck is Mother of Runes?
Edit: And the Wastelands...
Sig by NBW
- Alex
- Not Even MAD
- Posts: 4236
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:50 pm
They're not really essential. They're more or less just more tools for Knight of the Reliquary to play around with. They could be any utility land.Ahem...Karakas and Maze of Ith. But those two are perhaps not essential.PS: Modern adaptations to cards in that list:
Swords to Plowshares -> Path to Exile or Oust.
A/B duals -> Shocks.
At that point I think the only non-Modern card worth more than a buck is Mother of Runes?
The deck doesn't NEED Wastelands either, although if
he's playing Legacy burn he probably already has Wastelands.
- dpaine88
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 920
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:16 am
Fuck Cedric Phillips, dude is annoying as hell.You must have got lucky. Not like I have any idea what I am talking about. Cedric Phillips basically saysOMG Burning Earth is amazing, seriously 4-of in the board. Just won FNM and beat down Jund 2x, and UWR games 2 and 3 on the back of Burning Earth.
Mutavault was also friggen amazing..
Oh baby,It's a good time to be a red mage!!!
Was running the SCG Mono-Red list posted a few pages back, of course with a few modifications by Zeman
Anyone else get to try out some goodies from M14 this weekend?
everything I champion is wrong, so you should listen to him.
Seriously, well done though.
Burn baby burn!
- dpaine88
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 920
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:16 am
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Platypus
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 1448
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:30 pm
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Yeah, legacy burn doesn't run Wasteland.
Looking forward to M14 becoming fully available on MTGO; really excited to start testing.
Looking forward to M14 becoming fully available on MTGO; really excited to start testing.
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Bona fide hustler making my name
- dpaine88
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 920
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:16 am
Thats what I am almost on the fence about...putting in another 1-drop.I think the points he makes about needing an aggressive 1 drop; needing good mana; needing to impact the board and be proactive are all good points that are worth understanding if you're a developing red mage.
The deck is really full on 2 drops
BTE
Ash Zealot
FireFist Striker
Lightning Mauler
I do also like Mogg Flunkies..
Ugh those last minute decisions morning of a PTQ...always drive myself nuts
Burn baby burn!
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Yeah, PSully's deck only runs 12 2 drops (BTE, Firefist, Flunkies). Its pretty different to what everyone else has been doing.
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Bona fide hustler making my name
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Andrew Shrout's RDW posted by Johnny is very similar to the early versions of Sledgehammer Red, but it even further eschews the early game to emphasize card quality. Looking forward to playing around with it.
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Bona fide hustler making my name
Return to “Fires of Salvation”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests