Dies to Removal

Spam, pick your favorite Red common....

I believe I articulated why Red Aggro sucks some days ago, though thirst's deck looks promising.

I wouldn't put too much faith in it. You know I just threw the list together while posting and then made up some bullshit about a vague imaginary friend testing it to lend it credence, right?

Scrumpers in the Mist....

Spam, pick your favorite Red common....

does Goblin Legionnaire count?

hell, it's even got two scrumps on either side of the goblin

Spam, pick your favorite Red common....

does Goblin Legionnaire count?

hell, it's even got two scrumps on either side of the goblin

Holy fuckballs, the and the should be photoshopped on there!

I'm literally dying laughing right now.

Who in the hell in here is a photoshop wizard!? Where's NBW???

You can always photoshop the woman out of the art to get a truer FOS picture.

Or just alter the picture to show how FOS guys want her to look:

My sides!

A+ work today, gentlemen!

I want to believe.

[deck]
Creatures (29)
4 Elvish Mystic
4 Sylvan Caryatid
4 Boon Satyr
4 Fanatic of Xenagos
4 Goblin Rabblemaster
3 Polukranos, World Eater
4 Polis Crusher
1 Stormbreath Dragon
1 Xenagos, God of Revels

Spells (8)
3 Setessan Tactics
3 Xenagos, the Reveler
2 Sarkhan, the Dragonspeaker

Lands (23)
4 Wooded Foothills
4 Temple of Abandon
2 Mana Confluence
8 Forest
5 Mountain
[/deck]

The truth is out there, Val.

Watch out for The Smoking Man.

Deep Throat

Users browsing this forum: Khaospawn, NerdBoyWonder, nme, Tyrael, Valdarith and 0 guests

I see you there, NBW!

I see you FoS
Lying about testing
Lying about testing

Kids today and their "testing."

In my day we had to test in AOL chat rooms!

Waiting to get my haircut and catching up on the thread. No Photoshop powers on me right now.

I'm staying away from small red Aggro right now for standard. I've had the same feelin LP has had with red lists. I've headed in a R/G direction as well but also splashing blue for Savage Knuckleblade and Temur Charm. "TESTED" some games against my friend's Naya list last night. Heir of the Wild is solid. Stops opposing fatties from coming through or gets in for 2 to 3 damage. A turn 2 Rabblemaster is pretty ridiculous too.

I'll post a list tonight either here or make a thread in the standard section for it. Really liking how it plays out.

I want to believe.

[deck]
Creatures (29)
4 Elvish Mystic
4 Sylvan Caryatid
4 Boon Satyr
4 Fanatic of Xenagos
4 Goblin Rabblemaster
3 Polukranos, World Eater
4 Polis Crusher
1 Stormbreath Dragon
1 Xenagos, God of Revels

Spells (8)
3 Setessan Tactics
3 Xenagos, the Reveler
2 Sarkhan, the Dragonspeaker

Lands (23)
4 Wooded Foothills
4 Temple of Abandon
2 Mana Confluence
8 Forest
5 Mountain
[/deck]

Fuck the polis amirite

I want to believe.

[deck]
Creatures (29)
4 Elvish Mystic
4 Sylvan Caryatid
4 Boon Satyr
4 Fanatic of Xenagos
4 Goblin Rabblemaster
3 Polukranos, World Eater
4 Polis Crusher
1 Stormbreath Dragon
1 Xenagos, God of Revels

Spells (8)
3 Setessan Tactics
3 Xenagos, the Reveler
2 Sarkhan, the Dragonspeaker

Lands (23)
4 Wooded Foothills
4 Temple of Abandon
2 Mana Confluence
8 Forest
5 Mountain
[/deck]

Fuck the polis amirite

Satyrs wit attitude.

I like Heir of the Wilds as it's the only card besides Polukranos that can kill Siege Rhinos in GR.

1. Alex go build the program, updated for the current card pool. Or if it exists already, provide it for the clan. Otherwise stop your empty posturing.

2. The best archetypes in testing have been BGx and Mono Black Aggro. Junk is better against the field (not that we really know what the field looks like), but bug obliterates junk.

3. Have been testing Treasure Cruise in UR Delver in modern, it's very degenerate. I can see it being banned in legacy within six months.

Quick dumb question: does putting a morph creature card into play trigger Eidolon of the Great Revel's ability?

I would assume so.

No. It has no converted mana cost.

That doesn't make sense.

No converted mana cost for most intense and purposes is less then 1.

Where I'm confused is that you're placing it into play, so are you really casting it at this point?

ITT: We learn James doesn't know what Excel is.

Pyrostatic / eidolon DO trigger even though No Cost =/= less than 3. Judge / rules fail, but conduct yourselves accordingly.

Alex Go ahead and provide the spreadsheet as requested. I'm not really interested in your Internet posturing.

Also, Burn loses to Siege Rhino

It's like a thirty second Google search. I'm at work and can't pull links but you won't have trouble finding them.

If there's any sort of pinging affect, I may be tempted to go deep on Heir of the Wilds.

I don't think heart-piercer bow being an attack trigger is pretty shitty.

Where I'm confused is that you're placing it into play, so are you really casting it at this point?

Putting a morph creature into play is considered casting it.

702.34a Morph is a static ability that functions in any zone from which you could play the card it's on, and the morph effect works any time the card is face down. "Morph [cost]" means "You may cast this card as a 2/2 face-down creature, with no text, no name, no subtypes, no expansion symbol, and no mana cost by paying {3} rather than paying its mana cost." (See rule 707, "Face-Down Spells and Permanents.")