Page 113 of 1500
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 9:15 pm
by LP, of the Fires
As much as I LOVE the flaming, I agree with thirst. I mean, me and 3 people flamed Johnny_Spike to the point of him leaving sally for like a month, then he came back a better player, started posting in the clan thread, and has followed us to the land of milk and honey; or is that just thirst's jizz all over the place?
That and I think we all just started out as a cult based around Z's personality and enthusiasm. He really is our founding father of a sorts as I'm certainly not the purest of red mages, but I was ecstatic to find an actual brilliant poster with whom I could discuss transformational sideboards and hound of griselbrand tech with. Funnily, I didn't find out hound was a rare until last Tuesday when I actually took a keen look at the card.
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 9:17 pm
by rcwraspy
That's how I found FoS. By seeing the sig of intelligent contributors. I put myself squarely in the willing to learn category.
Just don't troll the staff so much - it's funny and all, but it doesn't actually accomplish anything besides getting you suspended.
I know you weren't a member when we were on Sally, but we got a ton of new members just by posting quality content and disproving obviously ignorant posts with sound logic, statistics, and evidence - that sort of stuff attracts a certain type and that type is who we want on this site (those who are competent and/or are willing to learn).
Telling someone they're an idiot in the most abrasive way possible is entertaining, but it doesn't further our goal of creating the best possible MtG community.
nBut, that's just my opinion on the matter
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 9:39 pm
by Alex
Just don't troll the staff so much - it's funny and all, but it doesn't actually accomplish anything besides getting you suspended.
I know you weren't a member when we were on Sally, but we got a ton of new members just by posting quality content and disproving obviously ignorant posts with sound logic, statistics, and evidence - that sort of stuff attracts a certain type and that type is who we want on this site (those who are competent and/or are willing to learn).
Telling someone they're an idiot in the most abrasive way possible is entertaining, but it doesn't further our goal of creating the best possible MtG community.
I don't care about any of that, I just enjoy seeing how mad Sene gets every time. Dude's a scumbag.
Probably
because part of him realizes how much of a sellout piece of shit he is.
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 9:41 pm
by Alex
PS: I don't even care about "building a community" because iridium is doing that job for us already. Anybody with common sense will find their way here eventually, with or without my intervention.
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 10:04 pm
by LP, of the Fires
So, I was testing Junk Rites versus Bant Aura's since it seems bant got new life breathed into it. Yeah, that deck gets donkey stomped by Acidic slime.
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 10:15 pm
by redthirst
Well, Alex - good job and carry on then, I suppose.
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 10:17 pm
by redthirst
LP, Slime is ridiculous - especially in this meta of 3+ color decks - it just gets overshadowed by tusk.
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 10:27 pm
by LP, of the Fires
Slime is actually better then Tusk in reanimator...yup.
Also, I only have 1 active red card. I think it's about time to start flaming LBS. He is such a great card analyst.
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 10:46 pm
by LP, of the Fires
Sasky, get your flame infraction ready.
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 11:06 pm
by Self Medicated
So there are rumors that Slivers are coming back in M14. What do you guys think about that?
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 11:09 pm
by Dodger
That's how I found FoS. By seeing the sig of intelligent contributors. I put myself squarely in the willing to learn category.
Just don't troll the staff so much - it's funny and all, but it doesn't actually accomplish anything besides getting you suspended.
I know you weren't a member when we were on Sally, but we got a ton of new members just by posting quality content and disproving obviously ignorant posts with sound logic, statistics, and evidence - that sort of stuff attracts a certain type and that type is who we want on this site (those who are competent and/or are willing to learn).
nTelling someone they're an idiot in the most abrasive way possible is entertaining, but it doesn't further our goal of creating the best possible MtG community.
But, that's just my opinion on the matter
That's why I'm here. Saw people from here really knew their shit over on the Rx forum and realized I could learn a ton posting with cool cats like that.
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 11:10 pm
by LP, of the Fires
Indifferent to slivers. The one sliver deck I did like though was a Wild pair combo deck from Time Spiral Block that Wafo made. Long story short, it drew LOTS of cards.
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 11:24 pm
by LP, of the Fires
Oh redthirst, giving Khamal the business. I don't know what's worse; Him, Steve, or the Debate thread.
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 11:39 pm
by LP, of the Fires
Found dpaine. redirecting him to the site.
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 11:45 pm
by dpaine88
Hey people! Hope all of you have been doin terriffic.
What decks are you running these days? I am about to try out the Aristocrats
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 11:53 pm
by redthirst
LP, they're all pretty terrible.
dpaine, still rolling Dos Rakis.
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 12:09 am
by hamfactorial
Dos Rakis for life! Hello again, old friend.
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 12:09 am
by Khaospawn
LP, if you could just find Dane now....
@dpaine- sup, bro. Still playing Mono Red.
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 12:30 am
by redthirst
I think I may be done with Kamahl for now, but I left him with a present - the opportunity to do some self-reflection.
What are the odds he doesn't squander the opportunity I've blessed him with?
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 12:34 am
by Helios
If your bank hasn't already alerted you, be aware:
http://pastebin.com/LXHKjsfg
Shit might go down.
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 12:46 am
by hamfactorial
Er mer gerd, Ernonemers!
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 1:14 am
by Christen
Trying to prepare a mono-red RTR block list. Suggestions would be appreciated.
[deck]Creatures
4 Rakdos Cackler
4 Legion Loyalist
4 Ash Zealot
4 Burning-Tree Emissary
4 Firefist Striker
4 Gore-House Chainwalker
4 Boros Reckoner
4 Rubblebelt Raiders
Spells
4 Mizzium Mortars
2 Weapon Surge
Lands
22 Mountain
Sideboard
3 Annihilating Fire
3 Act of Treason
3 Rakdos Shred-Freak
4 Mugging
2 Frostburn Weird
[/deck]
We have a non-existent metagame with RTR block constructed here so I'm going with the safest option and assuming a lot will choose aggro as well.
EDIT: herpderp Zealous Conscripts the fastest way to DQ land.
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 1:35 am
by Christen
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 1:40 am
by redthirst
Slivers are baller - Wizards even fixed them to specify that they now only work with slivers you control.
Also, I've honestly lost the will to argue with Kamahl any more - it's obvious to me and others in that thread that he's talking out of his ass, but he seems to prefer to remain stubbornly ignorant of that fact. Anyone want to tag in?
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 1:50 am
by Khaospawn
Why do the new slivers look like Predators?
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 1:55 am
by Link
Trying to prepare a mono-red RTR block list. Suggestions would be appreciated.
[deck]
2 Zealous Conscripts
[/deck]
We have a non-existent metagame with RTR block constructed here so I'm going with the safest option and assuming a lot will choose aggro as well.
ohohoho you tricksy bastard christen
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 1:57 am
by Christen
Trying to prepare a mono-red RTR block list. Suggestions would be appreciated.
[deck]
2 Zealous Conscripts
[/deck]
We have a non-existent metagame with RTR block constructed here so I'm going with the safest option and assuming a lot will choose aggro as well.
ohohoho you tricksy bastard christen
Oh... oh!
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 3:17 am
by TubeHunter
Predativers?
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 3:20 am
by zemanjaski
I for one welcome our new sliver overlords.
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 3:28 am
by photodyer
Slivers are baller - Wizards even fixed them to specify that they now only work with slivers you control.
Also, I've honestly lost the will to argue with Kamahl any more - it's obvious to me and others in that thread that he's talking out of his ass, but he seems to prefer to remain stubbornly ignorant of that fact. Anyone want to tag in?
Redthirst, you make a point here that is central to problems inherent in the boards, and which will ever be a challenge for evidence-based thinkers like us. Kamahl, LBS, Tuna...all the same issue: Boards are open conversations and regrettably that means that people who thrive on creating dissenting opinions and winning people over with them are a regrettable reality. It's a hard line for mods to walk if the
try to police
opinions, because it's too easy to come out on the side of draconian control. Not that it can't be done--the situation with Tuna is a good example (though he technically got kicked for flaming rather than being stupid). But it's difficult to deal with the person who is committed to their own voice and who gets their rocks off by enticing reactions to their garbage, both positive and negative. It's all feedback, and it feeds their need. The only thing that gets rid of these people is if they are ignored completely, and with people who post such drivel to the detriment of others that's hard to do.
If Sally's administration were more focused on content quality, the answer would be to report people's trash posts rather than argue; but given what we know of the culture there, that's not a viable solution. And quite honestly, it would not stop people like LBS anyway; if he got bounced he would be back under a different name before the day was out because he
has a psychological imperative driving him. He's committed to being heard, and his opinion is everything to him. That kind of zealotry is hard to fight, and I have no good answers. At least not any legal ones...
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 3:29 am
by Sasky
Seems strange to be part of a core set though. I thought core sets were supposed to be flavor-less.
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 3:39 am
by Alex
Seems strange to be part of a core set though. I thought core sets were supposed to be flavor-less.
Slivers aren't flavorful. Unless you count "unique to Magic" as a flavor. They put Planeswalkers that don't fit into the theme of Expert expansions in core sets all of the time, and Slivers aren't much different.
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 3:46 am
by Kazekirimaru
So there are rumors that Slivers are coming back in M14. What do you guys think about that?
MY SILVERS ARE BACK. <3
I'm going to wreck face with those motherfuckers. I am beyond happy.
Day 1 Ham Challenge.
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 4:07 am
by Kazekirimaru
Though I must say, the new Silver art is rubbish. Don't fix what isn't broken, Wizards.
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 4:11 am
by ExarionUniverse1
Though I must say, the new Silver art is rubbish. Don't fix what isn't broken, Wizards.
agreed
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 4:12 am
by Helios
Though I must say, the new Silver art is rubbish. Don't fix what isn't broken, Wizards.
Agreed.
"We had to make our monsters mire identifiable, so we gave them faces."
What?
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 4:17 am
by Helios
Why can non-clan members still post in this thread?
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 4:25 am
by dpaine88
dpaine, still rolling Dos Rakis.
Dos Rakis for life! Hello again, old friend.
@dpaine- sup, bro. Still playing Mono Red.
Damn, loyal to the death. How has Dos Rakis/RDW treating you guys? Going to any competitive events? or Dragon's Maze Prerelease? (Repping Rakdos of course!!)
I actually got sick of running Dos Rakis and kinda being auto-pilot at FNM so I decided to try out a bunch of new decks as I have been running nearly the same deck since my return to MTG in this past September.
Tried G/R aggro(small) , Jund Aggro(big and small), and a cool White Weenie brew.
There's one thing thats for sure, I just don't
like playing without my Falkenwrath Aristocrat. Found the Cedric Jund aggro list way too straightfoward and boring so I am challenging myself with The Aristocrats now
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 4:39 am
by Alex
Though I must say, the new Silver art is rubbish. Don't fix what isn't broken, Wizards.
agreed
Get the fuck out.
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 5:04 am
by ExarionUniverse1
Though I must say, the new Silver art is rubbish. Don't fix what isn't broken, Wizards.
agreed
Get the fuck out.
Look Guys, I admit I was wrong on all accounts and I actually hope to regain your friendships . I personally apologize to Ham, Khaospawn. , Alex, Valdarth, Asenath, Fate, and others. I will never post my awkward opinions or like I did to insult you guys here again .
I know its too much to ask ,but guys give me another chance maybe?
Sincerely, Onar