Dies to Removal

Stardust, are you trying to page one claim again? Is that what's going on?

Even though I brought it to page 2 and fucked it up!

Vote count #1:

Stardust(3): ham, rez, jaime
Ham(1): stardust
Jaime(1): witchhunt
Rianalnn(1): red
Not Voting(4): dechs, lmd, rianalnn, rcw

With 10 alive, it is 6 to lynch

Stardust, are you trying to page one claim again? Is that what's going on?

Nope.

WitchHunt and hamfactorial are probably town.

LMD, why are you voting for me?

*snort*

vote: lord wackdonalds

OK, just confirmed. Sorry for tardiness, but I have internet again.

Vote Stardust

I'll catch up to the game in a bit.

well shit on a toad i screwed up the tags

vote dechs kaison

*kpaca looks at the excitement and yelling leading to votes on dechs*

*kpaca laments having superior intellect but no opposable thumb*

*whine*

Stardust either has a double vote or he's messing around.

@mod: could we see a vote count?

Woof Woof! *kpaca happily barks in unison with ham while wagging his tail*

Bark twice if your role literally restricts you to this posting style.

Stardust apparently had a wagon.

There's no reason for it.

Unvote

As an alternative to rvs (and because I tire of rvs going beyond like 5 posts) how about an open ended question for everyone to answer.

Do you bluff having an ability as vanilla town and are being forced to claim?

Actually claiming a role you don't have is bad. I'll echo what was said earlier, someone will counterclaim you, you'll still get lynched, and the counter claim guy will get killed at night. It's all around bad.

Voting Jamie is the best way out of RVS, just sayin'.

@stardust: this more or less

Stardust, are you trying to page one claim again? Is that what's going on?

Nope.

WitchHunt and hamfactorial are probably town.

LMD, why are you voting for me?

Why am I probably town?

You're acting like you always do. It's a meta-call, I think.

Stardust either has a double vote or he's messing around.

@mod: could we see a vote count?

Woof Woof! *kpaca happily barks in unison with ham while wagging his tail*

Bark twice if your role literally restricts you to this posting style.

*kpaca notices a "mafia for dummies" book and quickly scoops it up in his mouth, happily bringing it as a present to be dropped at dechs kiason's feet*

KER-Thump!

*kpaca attempts to raise eyebrow but realizes he lacks the capability, choosing instead to lift his leg and urinate on Dechs Kiason*

You're acting like you always do. It's a meta-call, I think.

Heh, and you're answering questions I asked of another player, like you always do

Stardust either has a double vote or he's messing around.

@mod: could we see a vote count?

Woof Woof! *kpaca happily barks in unison with ham while wagging his tail*

Bark twice if your role literally restricts you to this posting style.

*kpaca notices a "mafia for dummies" book and quickly scoops it up in his mouth, happily bringing it as a present to be dropped at dechs kiason's feet*

KER-Thump!

*kpaca attempts to raise eyebrow but realizes he lacks the capability, choosing instead to lift his leg and urinate on Dechs Kiason*

This will end well, I just know it guys

That aside unvote

You're acting like you always do. It's a meta-call, I think.

Heh, and you're answering questions I asked of another player, like you always do

It did well enough for him last game I suppose.

And as a side bit, I've never actually watched Sons of Anarchy, so the dog bit might be wasted on me.

Vote count #2:

Stardust(2): ham, jaime
Ham(1): stardust
Jaime(1): witchhunt
Rianalnn(1): red
LMD(1): rianalnn
Dechs(2): rez, rcw
Not Voting(2): dechs, lmd

With 10 alive, it is 6 to lynch

*kpaca looks at the excitement and yelling leading to votes on dechs*

*kpaca laments having superior intellect but no opposable thumb*

*whine*

Is Timmy trapped in a well?

Vote Rianalnn because if he's just being cute I want it to stop.

That doesn't seem like a very good reason.

You have to communicate to play Mafia. He's not doing us any favors by acting like a dog. If it's just to be cute, I want him to stop it and just play the fucking game.

If it's actually a restriction from his role, fine. We'll figure out how to deal with it. He didn't give me a straight answer when I asked if it was a restriction placed by the role. I even gave him a "bark twice if" statement to get around the restriction. If it is a role restriction, I guess he's not allowed to answer that question.

u mad bro?

You have to communicate to play Mafia. He's not doing us any favors by acting like a dog. If it's just to be cute, I want him to stop it and just play the fucking game.

If it's actually a restriction from his role, fine. We'll figure out how to deal with it. He didn't give me a straight answer when I asked if it was a restriction placed by the role. I even gave him a "bark twice if" statement to get around the restriction. If it is a role restriction, I guess he's not allowed to answer that question.

*sigh*

You have to communicate to play Mafia. He's not doing us any favors by acting like a dog. If it's just to be cute, I want him to stop it and just play the fucking game.

If it's actually a restriction from his role, fine. We'll figure out how to deal with it. He didn't give me a straight answer when I asked if it was a restriction placed by the role. I even gave him a "bark twice if" statement to get around the restriction. If it is a role restriction, I guess he's not allowed to answer that question.

Ria's posts have made sense.

Well I guess I'm just not bright or patient enough to try to figure it out.

To be frank, it is possible that he may be unable to disclose the nature of his posting restriction (which he appears to have)

If that's the case, that is hilarious. I love it.

vote Rianalnn

Why?

If that's the case, that is hilarious. I love it.

vote Rianalnn

*kpaca lifts one ear quizically*

?????

Well I guess I'm just not bright or patient enough to try to figure it out.

*kpaca wags his tail approvingly*

ARF! ARf!

I'd rather have a sleb who can't communicate out of the game than a sleb who can.

Rianalnn if you show some actual intention by voting someone scummy (like stardust) I'd be behind you 100%

I'd rather have a sleb who can't communicate out of the game than a sleb who can.

Rianalnn if you show some actual intention by voting someone scummy (like stardust) I'd be behind you 100%

I feel it's a bit early to just classify Stardust as scummy, I'd say don't jump the gun too soon. It makes yourself come off as kind of scummy. That being said..

Unvote: Jaime

For now. I don't see the claim coming yet.

As for the whole dog thing, I'm making sense of it for the most part. Jaime, is this dog persona being trickier to understand the only thing that's turning your attention to him? He doesn't seem to be coming off as THAT scummy to me to warrant an instant vote.

I'd rather have a sleb who can't communicate out of the game than a sleb who can.

Rianalnn if you show some actual intention by voting someone scummy (like stardust) I'd be behind you 100%

*kpaca listens to your assertion he can't communicate and wonders if you are dense*

*kpaca also hears your assertion he should vote for "someone scummy like stardust*

*kpaca looks at your vote, not on stardust*

SNORT