[DTK] Draconian Roar

[( G_R )]

Draconian Roar [mana]1R[/mana]
Instant
Uncommon
As an additional cost to cast Draconian Roar, you may reveal a Dragon card from your hand.
Draconian Roar deals 3 damage to target creature.
If you revealed a Dragon card or controlled a Dragon as you cast Draconian Roar, Draconian Roar deals 3 damage to that creature's controller.


http://www.planetmtg.de/articles/artikel.html?id=6848

[( G_R )]

FOS I presume...

[Stardust]

It is very powerful in the right deck. Unfortunately, I don't think the right deck will include that many dragons...

[( G_R )]

I like it for a changeling deck.

[Stardust]

My old changeling zoo would like this a lot, yeah. That deck sucked but was a lot of fun.

[( G_R )]

Hey, that sounds like every other deck that I make.

[Thrillho]

This is like a worse version of the iteration of this card from Lorwyn block, because at least you had a coin-flip chance of Searing Blazing your opponent. This relies on you to both be playing and have in play or in hand a dragon. The former requires you to already be winning, the latter requires you to divulge that maybe your 2/2 isn't the best place for your opponent's Hero's Downfall.

There are enough playable dragons (Sarkhan's -2 [or +1 if you're going KTK] and Thundermaw Hellkite) in Standard where this isn't a big ask to also be playable as a marginally better/less color intensive Searing Blood, so I don't doubt it will appear in a/some decks. It is also possibly Just Worse than many other cards you're going to be playing in red decks, and certainly isn't a universal add to any deck w/ red in it, especially now that Roast is here.