There are (quite) a few things I want to try and clear up about the summer drama (or winter, as we call it), and I want to talk about it in case it is possible to reach some kind of understanding. I'll try to summarize things from my perspective.
How it started
I think discussion slowly started back in April, when some guy whose name I don't remember contacted the admins and asked to have his account deleted. He'd joined the Gutter, hadn't posted, but felt harassed enough by what was said in there that he wanted to leave the site. This was hot on the heels of a long CI discussion about cyberbullying, and I guess we were like "wait a minute, isn't all of this cyberbullying?". A disproportionate amount of issues stemmed from the Gutter, considering the number of members there. So why
are we keeping it, anyway? Almost all previous administrations had wanted to close it down, but didn't, presumably because they were afraid to do it. We wouldn't be like that. We were going to get rid of the cancer, finally.
Yeah.
So the discussion lasted for two months. Some of us were active and posting, some of us needed to be dragged in to post our " yeah I guess". We also decided to not drop it down to Mod Lounge level, or to the Pegging chamber. We were afraid of leaks and bullshit. One week before the thread was going up we felt like geniuses because it hadn't been leaked. One week after the thread went up I posted a huge apology thread in the Mod Lounge. Heh.
TBCITE
So the announcement is posted, and the great MTGS drama of 2012 has officially started. Conveniently enough, I suppose, I had to duck away almost immediately due to pretty serious
IRL issues, and when I got back, the thread was already 1k+ posts big. I start reading a bunch of posts, and I realize where we very obviously went wrong. The Gutter is primarily a community, not a trololo central, and it was the primary social space on the internet for many users that we were taking away without offering a realistic alternative. I guess I turned around pretty quickly, and started hinting in the various mod lounges that we should seriously consider a compromise.
"Alternative solutions to closing the Gutter"
Interesting, huh, how this probably led to way more issues than had we just said "no, we're closing it, end of story". But I can be a fairly naïve guy from time to time, and I truly believed that staff and Gutter could reach an agreement. Problem was, of course, that we entered these discussions (after a lot of fights within the staff) without actually having made up our mind. I wanted something (IIRC, no flaming, guttermods as staff, and
more information to new members), other staffers wanted more. There were a lot of conflicting messages that, I suppose, made you guys think we were lying and/or playing with you. We had lots and lots of discussions in the Mod Lounge, with each mod having their own unique belief about how to proceed, and at no levels within the staff could we really... agree. So we spent a long time discussing furiously in the ML, and I suppose you felt you were just kinda hanging there.
There was also the fact that we had a bunch of other drama happening at the same time. I don't think the Mod Lounge had ever been as active as it was during July this year. It was drama everywhere, and it pretty much sucked ass! I wanted to resign many times, but in my naïvety I thought we'd be done soon, just had to keep on trucking a little bit more.
So yeah, we had a ~800 post ML thread with furious discussion (in addition to a ~650 post global lounge thread), plus a bunch of other smaller ones, devoted to discussion about the
gutter, where we were, what we wanted, solutions, demands... I don't think we ever managed to agree. Especially on stuff like slurs. So we didn't get moving. This was our, no, my fault, for starting discussions before we, as a staff, had even made up our minds about what we wanted in the first place. I suppose the "negotiations" were doomed to fail, but it wasn't from lack of trying in my case - I'm pretty sure I put multiple hundreds of hours into the Gutter situation alone, bitching with other staff, posting long, annoying posts, and venting with those who were "on my side".
That said, it wasn't made any easier for us either. We were constantly shit on, people were negative, sarcastic, unpleasant, really hard to deal with. Many staffers were sympathetic during TBCITE, but turned around during pegs negotiations due to the attitude there and elsewhere. It was draining, and my patience obviously disappears steady and surely when repeatedly told I'm morally
corrupt and the like, while at the same time I'm continuously hearing from many staff that I'm playing favorites with the Gutter. Also, an inherent problem with the Gutter can often be, at least from our perspective, the group think that goes on. If a group of friends convinces each other that X is true, it's pretty hard to have a discussion about it.
( N_S )' suspension
So Scumbag got suspended for posting an IM from kpaca (who was suspended) looking like this: "Harkius, the staff-sponsored troll". If this was hotly contested by the gutter, it was no less controversial in the Mod Lounge. It took place across multiple threads, and as usual, we couldn't agree. I personally thought it was a really innocuous post and that while it technically broke the rule, the penalty should match the crime. Many agreed with this PoV, or thought it didn't break the rule at all, while others argued that the rules said X, and we shouldn't exercise favoritism just because this is a loud
Gutter member. The vote was pretty close to tied, but I argued that in the case of a staff that doesn't make up its mind, the ruling should favor the user, who is the one to face a tangible penalty after all. This only sparked more discussion, and Scumbag served his suspension (though only one week, despite it being his second suspension). Only a couple of weeks later did we finally reduce the suspension to an infraction, but I don't know if anyone got to know that, and obviously the damage was done already.
Kijin & kpaca's probations
that kpaca (who told this to Nai, actually) had done the same and voted with a gimmick on a CI poll, so it was decided to give kpaca the same penalty as Kijin.
( N_S )' ban
Fast forward a week or so, and we have a situation where, from our point of view, Scumbag was trolling CI pretty relentlessly, and was posting in the Gutter to boast about his trolling and encouraged others to do the same. This was a pretty big problem in our eyes, and was making the Gutter the exact thing it shouldn't be (a troll central). Rather than penalizing the entire Gutter for this kind of troublemaking, we were talking about what to do with Scumbag. Banning was indeed brought up as a possibility in the Global Lounge, but it was abandoned rather quickly. After discussion between the admins, we decided to just infract the posts in question.
Scumbag, however, had somehow heard that we were discussing whether or not to ban him only that he was either told, or interpreted it as us scheming our way into getting him
banned. As I understand it (I could be wrong - hey, that is basically the point of this thread, I want to know this stuff), Scumbag decided to post the Curse information he'd been withholding because he thought he was about to get banned anyway. From our perspective, Scumbag was posting this as a retaliation to the two infractions I had just given him. This was a friggin big deal for the site (much bigger than the closure of a random club house, or honestly anything else that had happened to the site since January 2005), and probably the most significant leak ever, and because it was done in retaliatory fashion (again, the way we saw it), and because of all the trouble Scumbag had caused recently, we decided to go with the ban. There was maybe one staff member who disagreed, I think.
kpaca and Kijin's bans
This one started with the message from Fabien telling us to shut Gutter down but not mention curse. Us, not realizing that this was a casual, half-baked suggestion
and not official in any way, started going all panic-mode. The thread you're all aware of due to the leaks appeared, and we were like what do, what do. After thinking about it for a while, I posted (09-21-2012, 10:47 AM):
way that understandably riled him up. And when my post that revealed that it was a misunderstanding was posted, that fact was not conveyed properly to kpaca (like, at all). So I'm interested to hear what the hell happened here, GR.
As for Kijin, I think that was more clean-cut than kpaca. He posted a huge CI thread revealing the information about Curse and such, I PM'd him to stop, he responded with a PM linking to the SCG thread and continued. I think I suspended him and went to bed, seething. In the morning, I resigned mainly because of that fact.
Kijin was banned, as was Madding, and badguy was later suspended. Madding was later unbanned and instead suspended. The reason for the differences in penalty was due to K&k probations.
Madding's, Shalako's, and poggydude's bans
While suspended, Madding used the gimmick belza to evade. Though claimed to be his girlfriend's account, the registration email on belza's account can be tracked to multiple different forums
with the username Madding. It was also pretty conspicuous that the gimmick started posting after years away immediately after Madding's suspension. He did nothing to deny this in his appeal threads, and the ban was upheld.
Shalako's gimmick, Zombie Zach, was shared with banned gutterites, and was therefore banned. We determined that this was entirely intentional, and that Shalako should be banned for harboring banned users. In the appeal thread, we felt Shalako was being dishonest, and we found no reason to think that the ban was incorrect.
poggydude was banned for using Hard Gay to troll and spam. If you actively try to bullshit around and make a mess, no reason to be lenient. Especially when done with a gimmick, which is inherently dishonest and sneaky.
The leak, MTGC, and "the future"
Staff leaks are one thing, but when you're leaked information about the discussion of rianalnn's re-application for staff and decide to ship him this, under a gimmick account:
n
When I posted as abrasively as I did a month ago or so (the "OP" of Advice from iridium ITT), it was partially due to me being pissed about people deciding that it's cool do stuff like this. But like I've explained before, the "advice" I posted was sincere.
Anyway, I hope we can all agree that we have both messed up something fierce during the past six months. I
think staff messed up at several points, like I've explained, and you've contributed by bashing on us repeatedly, and in the end, the staff had no time for bullshit.
If the decision is to put those six months behind us and start anew, I'm 100% ready to do that, however. I'm not actually morally corrupt or even mad, and I can definitely sympathize with Boubouille's intentions. I want to reconcile. But MTGS and CI and everything has been running pretty smoothly during the past couple of months, and it's easy for someone to draw a line and point towards the reason for that. We're worried that it's a bad thing for MTGS to process the unbans, and that it creates more problems than it solves, so it's pretty damn important that if unbans happen, we should all try to make sure that things continue like they currently are (i.e. not ridiculous drama, but fun times with your forum friends).
I'm tired of writing now, so I'll hit "submit". I'm sure I've missed a whole lot of stuff, but it
should be okay. I can post more later if it's important.